The GameMaster's Poker
School
Lesson 19: Special Situation Bets:
The Dead Money Bet
All of
us are capable of making a profit with a pair of Aces or Kings,
but it's what we do with marginal hands, like pairs below 8-8,
that can make a big difference in the overall profitability of
our game. You may
wonder why I specifically chose a pair of eights as my "line of
demarcation". I do so because eights are the median cards in a
deck; median meaning half the cards are of lower value (2s
through 7s) and half are higher (9s through Aces) - six of each
with 8s making up the 13th card. So, it follows that half the
time you hold a pair of 8s, any opponent that also holds a pair
has you beat. However, the nice thing about pair versus pair
matchups is that they are rare. The odds that one of your
opponents at a full table has a pair when you have a pair is
roughly 30 to 1, but if you have 2-2, you're almost certainly
beaten. However, that doesn't mean you shouldn't make the bet
I'll be describing here.
In my
experience, in the early stages of a tournament, be it single-
or multi-table, players will limp into a lot of pots when given
the opportunity to do so. Of course, many players will limp with
trash hands and a pair Aces alike, so if you're in late
position (Cutoff or Button) and you also limp, you're never
really sure where you stand. One of my favorite sayings is, "Expect
anything in an unraised pot." The way to handle that is to put in a
nice healthy raise if, say, at least four players have limped
in and you're in late position with a hand that can win on its
own. Obviously, that means any pocket pair, but it can also
mean a hand with an Ace or a King, suited or otherwise. Yes,
most likely you'll have to hit something on the flop to win if
all you have is A-x or K-x, but a pair of Aces or Kings will
often be a winner, so that's what I mean by "win on its own." I
would not include Q-x or lower in this
category.
So
let's say you have one of these qualifying hands and the blinds
are 5/10 in the early stages of a sit & go
tourney. With four
limpers and the blinds, the pot will be 55 when it gets to you
and you should raise the bet to at least 70. That means it will
cost the Small Blind 65 more to get in on a pot of 125, giving
him nearly 2 to 1 pot odds, so don't be surprised by his call,
which will raise the pot to 190. The Big Blind will have to put
in 60 more which will be 3 to 1 pot odds, so again, don't be
surprised if he calls. Of course, you don't really want to see
this hand to a showdown, but if the two blinds do call, you'll
have 70 chips invested in a pot that is now valued at 250,
which is better than 3.5 to 1 pot odds. Should you hold a
pocket pair, your probability of success with a pair of 2s
against two random hands like the blinds is 31% (just under 2
to 1), but the pot is offering 3.5 to 1. If you hold 7-7, your
probability of winning is 44%, which is just under even-money.
(For a good look at your probabilities against the two blinds,
see
Lesson
13.) Of course, other limpers may also call, but
that will only raise your pot odds, although you're very likely
facing a "real" hand if they do. If someone re-raises, you
should probably fold if your hand is lower than 8-8. I say
"probably" because in an online sit & go tourney, you may
not have much of a read on that player and he may have limped
with a big pair like As or Ks, in which case you're about a 4
to 1 underdog or he may have A-x or K-x, in which case you have
the best of it. So, if the pots odds warrant a call, you'll
have to use your best judgment, but I lean toward
folding. A re-raise is
the worst-case scenario, but what you'll generally find is that
everyone will fold to your raise except one other player and
that person will just call, which makes any other $$$ in the
pot "dead money", thus the name of this
bet.
Of
course, every hand is different, but if I raise preflop and the
remaining player(s) check to me after the flop, ninety percent
of the time I'm going to bet at least 75% of the pot at that
point. Remember,
your preflop raise basically said, "I have a pair or two big
cards" so if an Ace or King comes on the flop, just about the
only player who can call my post-flop bet is someone who either
has an Ace or a King, a pair that made a set or a drawing hand.
If the flop misses me completely, I'm still making that bet and
hopefully my opponent will fold. I only start to worry if I'm
called. If I'm re-raised, I just drop the hand and that's that,
but a caller is very likely slow-playing me. Now remember, I've
got "position" in this example and get to act last. With a hand
like 2-2, if my opponent who called then bets after the turn
card is placed on the board, I'm going to fold unless it's a
third 2, in which case I'll re-raise. If my opponent checks on
the turn, most of the time I'm going to check too and I'll get
to see the river card for free. The river will take care of
itself; I'll either be able to call a bet or I
won't.
But
the vast majority of the time when you make this bet, the
others will fold and you'll have made a nice profit at very
little risk. The
tighter your image, the better this works. Only relatively
sophisticated players will see this bet as a "steal", but even
they'll be surprised a lot of the time because very aggressive
players will make a bet like this with any two cards and you're
doing it with a pretty good hand. Remember, even 2-2 has the
best of it against two unpaired overcards.
The
Overbet
If and
when you find yourself with one of the larger stacks at the
table, you naturally don't want to tangle with anyone who has a
bigger stack than you unless you have a super-premium
hand. But that
doesn't mean you should just sit and wait for pocket Aces to
show up. If there are several players to your left who have a
chip stack equal to ten or fewer Big Blind bets and the pot is
unraised when it's your turn, put out a bet that's five or six
times the BB, even if you have a "marginal" hand like A-9o,
K-Js or a pair of 2s to 5s. Such a bet puts a lot of pressure
on those with smaller stacks and most of the time they'll fold,
especially if you're all close to getting "in the money".
Beware of the big stacks - ideally they have already folded -
but don't do this if one of them will be acting after you. In
the later stages of a tournament, the blinds and antes can be a
significant amount, and, so long as a 5x raise isn't more than
20% or so of your stack, this technique can pick up quit a few
chips at a critical time. Plus, it makes you look like a
"bully", which is a good image to have when you're really a
fairly tight player. Holding a less-than-premium hand makes it
easy to fold if someone re-raises you. But before you fold, see
what kind of pot odds you're being offered and whether or not
the re-raiser has gone all in; they may be just acting out of
desperation and it might be profitable to make the
call.
The GameMaster's Poker School
Lesson 20: Is 2 to 1 a Good Deal?
The
quick answer: maybe. If I were to offer you two to one odds on
a coin flip, it would be a great bet, at least from a
probability point of view. The math is simple; I'd be willing to
pay you $2 on your $1 bet based upon an event that will happen
one time out of two tries. The probability of success is 50%,
but you need a probability of only 33% to break even, so that's
a great bet, at least on the surface. You can probably tell I'm
hinting about a downside here, so let's talk about it in poker
terms - specifically poker tournament terms, rather than cash
or "ring" game terms. Why the distinction? Because in a cash
game, if you take a 2 to 1 bet and lose, you can just reach in
your pocket for more $$$. In a tournament, losing the hand may
knock you out of contention or even bust you. It's like me
offering you 2 to 1 on a coin flip, but you have to bet
everything you own. Sure, do it often enough and you'll bust
me, but if you lose the first time we do it, you're busted and
don't get a second chance. Does two to one still sound
good?
My
point here is that every bet has a mathematical value, which
can usually be measured precisely and a relative value, which
is more difficult to measure because it must be done in
relationship to other factors. Flipping a coin for a buck is one thing;
flipping a coin for your entire net worth is another thing
entirely. Fortunately, none of us has to risk our entire net
worth on the outcome of a poker tournament, but we do want to
finish as close to the top as possible, so we have to examine
our bets from both a mathematical point of view and a relative
point of view. For example, let's say you're in the Big Blind,
which is $200 and you have $3000 left in chips after posting. A
player in Middle Position bets $700 and everyone, including the
Small Blind folds. The pot is now $1000 ($100 SB, $200 BB, $700
from MP player) and it will cost you $500 to call, so you're
getting two to one on your money. Now remember that your $200
blind bet is gone - once it's posted, it no longer belongs to
you, so you don't use that in figuring odds like this. It's
simply a case of paying $500 to try and win $1000, which is 2
to 1 pot odds. In Lesson 2, I showed you some basic poker math
that tells us how to convert probability to odds and
vice-versa. Pot odds of 2 to 1 means you need a probability of
just over 33% to break even (add 2 + 1 = 3; divide that into
100 and the result is 33.33). So, if we have a hand that we
think has a 34% probability of winning, the math says it's a
call.
But
there are several problems here. First of all, if the raiser
has A-A and we have Q-Q, our probability of winning is only
about 20%, so we're not getting a good "price" for our
bet. On the other
hand, if our opponent raised with, say, A-K offsuit, our
probability of winning is closer to 55%, which makes this a
great call with Q-Q. But what if we have to go all-in to make
the call? Is the return big enough; is 2 to 1 a good deal? For
me, if I were short-stacked, I'd be happy to get all my $$$
into the pot with a pair of Queens. If my opponent has A-A or
K-K, I'm basically toast and as the saying goes, "that's
poker", but I'm a favorite in most other situations. Sadly,
most hands you'll encounter are not as clear-cut as this.
What's more likely is that you'll hold something like 5-5, K-Jo
or A-4 suited (I'm assuming you'll fold the truly "junk" hands
like Q-7o,10-5s, etc.) and calling the bet won't force you
all-in, but it would be a shame to miss a chance to add to your
stack. What to do?
First, of
course, you have to consider the source of the bet. A Middle
Position raise from a player you perceive as "tight" may well
mean s/he has a pocket pair of 9s or better or maybe A-Ko, A-Js
or K-Qs. Here's how
those hands match up against yours:
| Opponent |
You |
Your
probability of winning |
| 9-9 |
5-5 |
19.8% |
| A-Ko |
5-5 |
55.0% |
| A-Js |
5-5 |
51.2% |
| K-Qs |
5-5 |
50.3% |
| 9-9 |
K-Jo |
44.3% |
| A-Ko |
K-Jo |
26.2% |
| A-Js |
K-Jo |
24.5% |
| K-Qs |
K-Jo |
25.0% |
| 9-9 |
A-4s |
33.7% |
| A-Ko |
A-4s |
31.5% |
| A-Js |
A-4s |
31.1% |
| K-Qs |
A-4s |
56.8% |
It's
easy to see that calling if you have a pair or a suited A-x is,
for the most part, profitable or very close to
it. The problem is
that you're really in trouble if your opponent has a pair
higher than yours, or if s/he has one of your cards along with
a higher kicker, like A-Ko vs. K-Jo. But even there, if the pot
is paying you 3 to 1, it's not the worst call you'll ever make.
These numbers obviously don't cover all possible situations,
but they at least will give you a feel for what you can expect
when the pot is offering 2 to 1 on your money. Of course, if
your opponent is a "loose" player who might raise with hands
like Q-Js, A-10o or 6-6, then your probabilities will look even
better, so it's probably fair to say the percentages shown here
are a worst-case scenario.
There
is no hard and fast rule that can come out of this discussion
because the possibility of your opponent holding a high (Jacks
or better) pair skews the numbers quite
bit. While every
hand is different, I'd be very tempted to call with any pair;
any hand with a King, face card and any A-x suited when the pot
is paying 2 to 1 or more. That's the math side of it. The
"relative value" side, where I might have to go all in would
find me playing any pair above 8-8 and very likely folding
everything else, unless I have a stack of less than 5 times the
Big Blind. In that case I'd play with any decent hand, like
those listed above. If I'm short, but hold an A-x suited or a
pair of 8s or better, I'll likely re-raise to try and win the
pot right there, even though my short stack will basically tell
the original raiser that I'm desperate, which greatly reduces
my "folding equity".
The
important thing to take away from this lesson is a feel for
what hands are worth holding in a 2 to 1 pot odds
situation. I've
obviously not covered all of them, so you should continue
comparing hands as I did here. My numbers come from the free
poker odds calculator that's available at www.cardplayer.com/.
When you get a chance, check out the probabilities for such
"classic" matchups, like two overcards versus two lower, suited
connectors and a pair versus a higher card and a lower card
(10-10 vs. A-9, for example). You don't have to be exact about
the percentages when you're involved in a hand, but knowing
that your hand has a 33+% probability against what your
opponent may be holding can earn you a lot of $$$ over the
long-term.
I'll see
you here next time.
|